The Lie of the Century

Now we have the lie of the century. According to the left wing extremist that now control the Democrat Party, George Bush “lied” to us about why we took out the most heinous dictator around, the man who has the undisputed record of killing the most Muslims in history, SaddamHussein. There were no weapons of mass destruction.

And one bright morning, after he had illegally stolen the election, he decided that we should take out Saddam. He alone, was telling us this whopper about these nonexistent weapons.
This, of course, is the lie. This is the lie of the century.

The truth is a little different. Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, and he used them. Ask the Kurds, visit the semi ghost town where he gassed them. Recall a little history, even if it does not support the anti-American American’s cherished lie of the century. The Israelis took out Saddam’s nuclear reactor to thwart his weapons program. But, it didn’t stop it. British Intelligence sticks by their assessment that he was attempting to get “yellow cake” a key ingredient for a nuke from Africa. Every intelligence agency in the world agreed on that Iraq had a nuke weapons program.

After the war, we found no weapons, but the labs where work was progressing were found. He either hid them or sent them out of the country at some point before the GI’s arrived. What the hell ever, he doesn’t have them now and he won’t be the one using them on us.

Those far leftist who sit now in the Senate, frothing at the mouth over this week’s “auspicious” event of having lost two thousand soldiers in Iraq as Senator ‘hicup’ Kennedy joyously said. (I thought waving the Al Qaeda flags and sporting the little yellow “Free Saddam” pins was a bit much.)

But, truth of the matter is that the Senate, the two faced liar, Senator Kerry, I wanned be President after trashing America over Vietnam, voted to send in troops, twice, with the same intelligence W had.

To try to rewrite history, that is the lie.

We need a fence, a fence on the southern border to the United States. We are being invaded, our country and culture undermined. Those that complain that this would be unfriendly to Mexico need to look to the southern border of that country. They have troops on their borders and run what smacks of concentration camps. This government’s opinion of us, a government which aids and abets this invasion is of little concern. The President of Mexico actually began his campaign for reelection in California, which one supposes he realizes it is now one of the Mexican states.
Those defeatists insist that the distance is too great for a fence forget the truth. There is a fence in Israel, which has worked in reducing terrorism across its border. It does not go the full distance. Neither would a fence on our border, it should be placed in those areas that the Border Patrol knows are the freeways of the criminals coming across. The effect would be to funnel the traffic, leading to better apprehension in the unfenced areas.
There is a fenced portion of the border around San Diego. It works.
The President who is in office, and has allowed terrorists to come over what is now a laughably porous non barrier will literally have hell to pay.

The latest poll in Britain shows that six per cent of their Muslim population supports the terrorist bombings of 7/7. Some twenty four per cent have sympathy and almost half understand the motives of the bombers. About a third would like to end western civilization. In short about 100,000 have no sympathy for the country they are living in.

Here is some unsolicited advice to England. Be proactive and take some steps to reduce this disloyal population.

· Halt immigration from any country where the Wahabi “religion” of hate is practiced.
· Monitor all mosques and make it illegal to preach this brand of hate, Wahabism.
· Any mosque found doing this should have all its property forfeited to the government and the clerics deported.
· Require all Muslim citizens to assimilate into the general population. This could require the end to wearing religious costumes, certainly learning English and taking an oath to support laws and culture of the country.

All this is very un-libertarian, but whether everyone agrees or not, western civilization will continue to be attacked until each country deals with these crazies.

While the Mother Country goes its way, we need to do these things here as well.

We are being invaded! Go to REFORMUS.ORG to sign their petition!

A Friendly Proposal to the Democrat Party Faithful

We need a vibrant and healthy Democratic Party. There is a great danger that those who now control the party will put yet another spin on the truth. Their message was not misunderstood and falsely restated by the Republicans. What there was of it beyond WE HATE BUSH was bested in the arena of ideas, politics. All things change in time except truth. It’s time for the leaders of the party to steer to the center again. You do not have to become Republicans, just keep it perfectly clear you are not with the crazies

A case in point, is the vulgar fat delusional propagandist Michael Moore. He became the defacto face of the party. Decent, reasonable Democrats should loudly distance themselves from him. If the New York Times et al were worth ten to fifteen s in the election, Moore was worth twenty to thirty to the Bushies.

There was a better time when politics stopped at the shoreline of America. Democrats need to listen to those among them that do not believe America is evil, and that all answers come from the UN and that appeasement is the answer to being attacked. Plus, a record of not bashing the military would be helpful. JFK and FDR took America’s side against a misguided world.

There are issues which the Democrats can work on. Bring big Parma to heel. Drug prices are a disgrace. They are what the market will bear here, which is ok, except the power of the Federal Government should be used to level the playing field. As long as we are into disallowing free speech as with the wildly successful Campaign Finance law, advertising drugs on TV should be eliminated. Drugs should be tested, not against nothing, but against the current best drug for the problem.

The party should be the party of change for the better. One thing that must change is Social Security. Digging heels into the sand and saying nothing must change is being a deer in the headlights.

Democrats should champion keeping a woman free to choose abortion or pregnancy prevention but be reasonable about partial birth abortion.

Democrat of today, could as did the party in the past, stand for States Rights, particularly in regard for what might be called moral issues. If Massachusetts wants gay marriage, or Oregon wants the right to die, or Nevada OK’s prostitution, then so be it. Let the people in the state, not a judge trying to make law, decide it.

Above all, Democrats need to come up with practical, if not generally currently accepted solutions to problems. Desist from demonizing the opposition. Yes, Republicans too.

Things that should be done

In no particular order, here are some things which are not always popular but should be done.

• Pass an Amendment to the Constitution, that gives the President a line item veto of any spending measure. Who in the world could be against this? The really big government people I guess.
• Start a two pronged attack on our dependence on foreign oil. Allow drilling on the moonscape in northern Alaska, and begin a wartime shift from oil to hydrogen. See phoenixproject.net
• Pass a Guest Worker program which does not reward illegal aliens.
• Get an exit strategy. Not for Iraq or Afghanistan, we have plans there but for Germany, Japan, Korea, the Balkans and any other place we have no national interest in being there.
• Follow through with a plan to get men to Mars.
• Use the buying power of Medicare Care to get competitive bids on prescription prices.
* Use Shot Spot for professional tennis matches

Thoughts on Immigration Policy Changes

Recently President Bush’s concept to set up a Guest Worker Program has come under intense fire from his own supporters. The concept in greeted as just another amnesty for illegal immigrants although the plan does not automatically grant citizenship to guest workers. The cry is that criminal trespassers are being given a reward which will just lead to an increased avalanche of Mexicans paddling across the border. But we do need the workers and we do need to control the flow of non-citizens in and out of this country. How about this? Have the plan only for new people from Mexico or other countries, signing up as the plan envisions, being vetted with cooperation of the Mexican government to disallow criminals and the like. The current many millions of illegals would have to return to Mexico before being allowed to enter the program. They would be given a period to return to Mexico. If they are caught after this deadline they would be forever disallowed from being in the Guest Worker Program. To make any of this work a there needs to be a Federal Law that all law enforcement officers in the United States must turn over any and all illegals to the Homeland Security Department and to have deportation swift and sure.

Elementary Logic: The Sidewalk is NOT causing the rain.


Some misguided souls among us look at the spots of water on the sidewalk and decide the sidewalk is causing the rain. So it is today with some who see the fanatic Muslims spread their murder and killings of innocents around the world. In their denial, they feel it was President Bush’s fault for visiting London that caused there to be terror attacks against British interests in Turkey. No, the terrorists stuck there because they could. It is a measure of the success in the War on Terror that these suicide killers are reduced to hitting soft targets, preferably where there isn’t that much security. But, the terrorists are the one’s doing the killing not the President of the United States. Note that Turkey defied the US, disallowing the US Army access to Iraq from their shores. The Turks probably were doing this with the hope that this would spare them of the terrorist’s attacks. Cowering before these monsters doesn’t help; at least it didn’t stop the bombings in Istanbul.

As Printed in the AZ Republic



Isolationist policy won't stop terror
Oct. 31, 2003 12:00 AM


Regarding Robert Robb's column Wednesday, "Why is U.S. such a target?":

I at least like his tone: not dripping with hate the way most Bush-haters are these days.

But Robb is wrong. These fanatics hate everyone. Besides the Sept. 11, 2001, atrocity, they have killed citizens in Bali, workers from the United Nations and the Red Cross in Baghdad and even fellow Saudis in Saudi Arabia. These miscreants hate anything that does not follow their anti-freedom credo of taking the world back the 10th century.

Jimmy Carter pulled the rug on the shah and we got the ayatollah. Saddam Hussein killed more Muslims than anyone in history.

We are at least opposing Arafat under Bush, not kissing him in the Rose Garden as Clinton did.

Be plain about what you want. What Robb wants is an isolationist, cut-and-run policy. Maybe he can gain support for his position, but then we will be fighting in Cleveland, not Baghdad.