New Movie: Flag of Our Mothers

Hey, have you heard?

Nancy Palousy has a new anti-war movie.

Flags of Our Mothers!

It features a great big white flag. No it’s not for surrender, it’s to show unity with the Taliban…(they use the white flag to show their purity, they’ll lop anyone’s head off)

Watch out Al Bore. Now there’s real competition for the Oscar.

A note

A Note from Bin Laden
Please welcome Jihad Jane
Salaam aleikum dear brothers. I have the pleasure to announce that noted anti-American American Jane Fonda has now taken up our cause. As you may know she narrowly escaped the firing squad for her timely support of the Viet Cong. Now she is marching in the Great Satan’s capitol, praising our cause, praise be to
Allah, Mohammed blessings and peace be upon him.
It is hoped she can visit our front bases in Iraq. If she does, just imagine what interest her being held hostage would bring. Perhaps millions of American dollars could be brought to our cause by the “Progressives” and their rich Anti-war supporters. Perhaps, her beheading on Algazera TV would garner great ratings and so help our cause.
This is just great news. Welcome Jihad Jane to our world Islama-Nazi movement. Our death cult will ultimately rule the world!
Again, praise Allah, Mohammed blessings and peace be upon him.

It's a War Stupid

It’s a War, Stupid

We had 9/11, yet too many Americans still don’t get it or choose to ignore the obvious. We are in some kind of time warp, taken back to the time before America officially got into WWII. Then, as now, a lot of people put their heads in the sand and say we should stay out of it. Then it was, the Nazis aren’t so bad, just comical, it isn’t our fight and Mussolini makes the trains run on time. Now with the far left taking over the Democrat Party, the anti-war fervor is even more active than it was just before the date that would live in infamy, December 7, 1941. The sneak attack on Pearl Harbor changed things overnight. Now, we had our Pearl Harbor on the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center but the hate driven Democrats would rather fault the President than join in common cause to the defend not only the country, but Western Civilization.
Now, just as then, we are at war on many fronts, on a worldwide scale. We are at war, in Lebanon with the fighting between Israel and Iran’s version of the Storm Troopers, Hezbollah. We are at war in Afghanistan with the remnants of the Taliban, at war around the globe with the terrorist group Al Qaeda. And yes, Alice, in Iraq with the Shite militias, again agents of Iran, soldiers in the Islama-Nazis’ war with Western civilization.
This is World War III and although different, it has many similarities with WWII. In WWII, the base problem was the absurd racial notions the Nazis conjured up. The Muslim Wahabi Mullahs have distorted their “religious” notions in a similar absurd way to condone killing anyone or even everyone who doesn’t accept their crazy theories. A movement which raises children to be suicide bombers is on it’s face the definition of evil. It’s policy on women is based on the 12th century manners and customs. One direct association with the Nazi movement is of course the Isalma fascist’s hatred of the Jews. They have as a near term goal the annihilation of Israel, just a stepping stone to achieving world domination of the dark night of their version of Islam for the entire globe.
One wonders if the Iranian “President” selected by the unelected Mullahs is trying to even look like Hitler with his mustache and hair hanging down his forehead. He has put together his own version of the Axis Powers including Syria (his Italy), North Korea (his Japan) and he has even brought in Venezuela (his Spain). At first look this is not a very impressive coalition. There is no economic power here (about the gross yearly product of Cleveland except for our oil money Venezuela gets) but what these Islama-fascists lack in technical and economic power they loom big in the area of population, a population they are willing to use as for instance in a nuclear exchange. This is why it would not be rational to allow these crazies to develop nukes. In the old days, MAD, Mutually Assured Destruction, might be expected to work as it did the Russians. Various Iranian mullahs have already announced they will have no restraint in using these weapons as they can take the losses to their population while the West could not.
So in the face of this world situation what does our party out of power choose to do? Push a program of defeat and retreat plus depreciate anything the President and his administration tries to do. Another 9/11 foiled? This was caused by the war in Iraq, as if the Japanese fought to the end because they were angry about Guadalcanal. Catching intercepts of conversations between terrorists? The President is defying the Constitution.
Sometimes, an election is typified by one phrase. This year it may well be, “It’s a War Stupid.”

Guest Piece

This war is for real

By Major General Vernon Chong, USAF, ret.

October 1, 2005

T o get out of a difficulty, one usually must go through it. Our country is now facing the most serious threat to its existence, as we know it, that we have faced in your lifetime and mine (which includes WWII).The deadly seriousness is greatly compounded by the fact that there are very few of us who think we can possibly lose this war, and even fewer who realize what losing really means.First, let's examine a few basics: 1. When did the threat to us start?Many will say September 11, 2001. The answer, as far as the United States is concerned, is 1979 22 yyears prior to September 2001 with the following attacks on us:

Iran Embassy Hostages, 1979;

Beirut, Lebanon, Embassy, 1983;

Beirut, Lebanon, Marine Barracks, 1983;

Lockerbie, Scotland, Pan-Am flight to New York, 1988;

First New York World Trade Center attack, 1993;

Oklahoma City Murrah Federal Building, 1995;

Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, Khobar Towers Military complex, 1996; Nairobi, Kenya, U.S. Embassy, 1998;

Dares Salaam, Tanzania, U.S. Embassy, 1998;

Aden, Yemen, USS Cole, 2000;

New York, World Trade Center, 2001;

Pentagon, 2001; Shanksville, Pennsylvania, Plane Crash, 2001

(Note that during the period from 1981 to 2001 there were 7,581 terrorist attacks worldwide).

2. Why were we attacked?

Envy of our position, our success, and our freedoms. 1 The attacks happened during the administrations of Presidents Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, and Bush 2 We cannot fault either the Republicans or Democrats, as there were no provocations by any of the Presidents or their immediate predecessors, Presidents Ford or Carter. 3 Who were the attackers?In each case, the attacks on the U.S. were carried out by Muslims. 1 What is the Muslim population of the World? 25 percent. 2 Isn't the Muslim Religion peaceful?Hopefully, but that is really not material. There is no doubt that the predominently Christian population of Germany was peaceful, but under the dictatorial leadership of Hitler (who was also Christian), that made no difference. You either went along with the administration, or you were eliminated. There were 5 to 6 million Christians killed by the Nazis for political reasons (including 7,000 Polish priests).Thus, almost the same number of Christians were killed by the Nazis, as the six million holocaust Jews who were killed by them, and we seldom heard of anything other than the Jewish atrocities.Although Hitler kept the world focused on the Jews, he had no hesitancy about killing anyone who got in his way of exterminating the Jews, or of taking over the world German, Christtian, or any others.Same with the Muslim terrorists. They focus the attention of the world on the U.S., but kill all in the way their own people, or the Spanish, French, or anyone else. The point here, is that just like the peaceful Germans were of no protection to anyone from the Nazis, no matter how many peaceful Muslims there may be, they are no protection for us from the terrorist Muslim leaders, and what they are fanatically bent on doing by their own pronouncements killing all of us "infidels." I don't blame the peaceful Muslims. What would you do if the choice was shut up, or die? 1 So who are we at war with?There is no way we can honestly respond that it is anyone other than the Muslim terrorists. Trying to be politically correct, and avoid verbalizing this conclusion can well be fatal. There is no way to win, if you don't clearly recognize, and articulate who you are fighting.

So with that background, now to the two major questions: 1 Can we lose this war? 2 What does losing really mean?

If we are to win, we must clearly answer these two pivotal questions.We can definitely lose this war, and as anomalous as it may sound, the major reason we can lose is that so many of us simply do not fathom the answer to the second question "What does losing mean?"It would appear that a great many of us think that losing the war means hanging our heads, bringing the troops home, and going on about our business, like post-Vietnam. This is as far from the truth as one can get. What losing really means is: We would no longer be the premier country in the world. The attacks will not subside, but rather will steadily increase. Remember, they want us dead, not just quiet. If they had just wanted us quiet, they would not have produced an increasing series of attacks against us, over the past 18 years. The plan was clearly, for terrorists to attack us, until we were neutered, and submissive to them.We would, of course, have no future support from other nations, for fear of reprisals, and for the reason that they would see that we are impotent, and cannot help them.They will pick off the other non-Muslim nations, one at a time. It will be increasingly easier for them. They already hold Spain hostage. It doesn't matter whether it was right or wrong for Spain to withdraw its troops from Iraq. Spain did it because the Muslim terrorists bombed their train, and told them to withdraw the troops. Anything else they want Spain to do, will be done. Spain is finished.The next will probably be France. Our one hope on France is that they might see the light and realize that if we don't win, they are finished too, in that they can't resist the Muslim terrorists without us. However, it may already be too late for France. France is already 20 percent Muslim, and fading fast! If we lose the war, our production, income, exports, and way of life will all vanish, as we know it. After losing, who would trade or deal with us, if they were threatened by the Muslims?If we can't stop the Muslims, how could anyone else?The Muslims fully know what is riding on this war, and therefore, are completely committed to winning, at any cost. We better know it too, and be likewise committed to winning at any cost.Why do I go on at such lengths about the results of losing? Simple. Until we recognize the costs of losing, we cannot unite, and really put 100 percent of our thoughts and efforts into winning. And, it is going to take that 100 percent effort to win. So, how can we lose the war?Again, the answer is simple. We can lose the war by "imploding." That is, defeating ourselves, by refusing to recognize the enemy and their purpose, and really digging in and lending full support to the war effort. If we are united, there is no way that we can lose. If we continue to be divided, there is no way that we can win!Let me give you a few examples of how we simply don't comprehend the life-and-death seriousness of this situation.President Bush selects Norman Mineta as Secretary of Transportation. Although all of the terrorist attacks were committed by Muslim men between 17 and 40 years of age, Secretary Mineta refuses to allow profiling. Does that sound like we are taking this thing seriously?This is war! For the duration, we are going to have to give up some of the civil rights we have become accustomed to. We had better be prepared to lose some of our civil rights temporarily, or we will most certainly lose all of them, permanently.And, don't worry that it is a slippery slope. We gave up plenty of civil rights during WWII, and immediately restored them after the victory, and in fact, added many more since then.

Do I blame President Bush or President Clinton before him?No, I blame us for blithely assuming we can maintain all of our Political Correctness, and all of our civil rights during this conflict, and have a clean, lawful, honorable war. None of those words apply to war. Get them out of your head.Some have gone so far in their criticism of the war and/or the Administration that it almost seems they would literally like to see us lose. I hasten to add that this isn't because they are disloyal. It is because they just don't recognize what losing means. Nevertheless, that conduct gives the impression to the enemy that we are divided and weakening. It concerns our friends, and it does great damage to our cause.Of more recent vintage, the uproar fueled by the politicians and media regarding the treatment of some prisoners of war, perhaps exemplifies best what I am saying.We have recently had an issue, involving the treatment of a few Muslim prisoners of war, by a small group of our military police.These are the type of prisoners, who just a few months ago, were throwing their own people off buildings, cutting off their hands, cutting out their tongues, and otherwise murdering their own people, just for disagreeing with Saddam Hussein.And just a few years ago, these same types of prisoners chemically killed 400,000 of their own people for the same reason. They are also the same type of enemy fighters who recently were burning Americans, and dragging their charred corpses through the streets of Iraq.And still more recently, the same type of enemy that was, and is, providing videos to all news sources internationally, of the beheading of American prisoners they held.Compare this with some of our press and politicians, who, for several days, have thought and talked about nothing else but the "humiliating" of some Muslim prisoners not burning them, not draggging their charred corpses through the streets, not beheading them, but "humiliating" them.Can this be for real?The politicians and pundits have even talked of impeachment of the Secretary of Defense.If this doesn't show the complete lack of comprehension and understanding of the seriousness of the enemy we are fighting, the life and death struggle we are in, and the disastrous results of losing this war, nothing can.To bring our country to a virtual political standstill over this prisoner issue makes us look like Nero playing his fiddle, as Rome burned totally oblivious to what is going on in the real world. Neither we, nor any other country, can survive this internal strife.Again I say, this does not mean that some of our politicians or media people are disloyal. It simply means that they are absolutely oblivious to the magnitude of the situation we are in, and into which the Muslim terrorists have been pushing us, for many years. Remember, the Muslim terrorists' stated goal is to kill all infidels! That translates into all non-Muslims not just in thee United States, but throughout the world.We are the last bastion of defense.We have been criticized, for many years, as being "arrogant." That charge is valid, in at least one respect. We are arrogant in that we believe that we are so good, powerful, and smart; that we can win the hearts and minds of all those who attack us; and that with both hands tied behind our back, we can defeat anything bad in the world!We can't!If we don't recognize this, our nation as we know it, will not survive, and no other free country in the World will survive, if we are defeated.And finally, name any Muslim countries throughout the world that allow freedom of speech, freedom of thought, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, equal rights for anyone let alone everyone, equal status, or any status for women, or that have been productive in one single way that contributes to the good of the world.This has been a long way of saying that we must be united on this war, or we will be equated in the history books to the self-inflicted fall of the Roman Empire. If, that is, the Muslim leaders will allow history books to be written, or read.If we don't win this war right now, keep a close eye on how the Muslims take over France in the next 5 years or less. They will continue to increase the Muslim population of France, and continue to encroach little by little, on the established French traditions. The French will be fighting among themselves, over what should or should not be done, which will continue to weaken them, and keep them from any united resolve. Doesn't that sound eerily familiar? Democracies don't have their freedoms taken away from them by some external military force. Instead, they give their freedoms away, politically correct piece by politically-correct piece.And, they are giving those freedoms away to those who have shown, worldwide, that they abhor freedom, and will not apply it to you, or even to themselves, once they are in power. They have universally shown that when they have taken over, they then start brutally killing each other, over who will be the few who control the masses. Will we ever stop hearing from the politically correct, about the "peaceful Muslims"?I close on a hopeful note, by repeating what I said above. If we are united, there is no way that we can lose. I hope, now after the election, the factions in our country will begin to focus on the critical situation we are in, and will unite to save our country. It is your future we are talking about! Do whatever you can to preserve it.After reading the above, we all must do this not only for ourselves, but our children, our grandchildren, our country, and the World.Whether Democrat or Republican, conservative or liberal, and that includes the Politicians and media of our country, and the free World!

Please forward this to any you feel may want, or need to read it. Our "leaders" in Congress ought to read it, too. There are those who find fault with our country, but it is obvious to anyone who truly thinks through this, that we must unite! ------

No one in the world news media that I’ve heard is mentioning how absurdly short sighted these raging Muslims are that they are going bonkers over pictures of Mohammad with a bomb on his head when those who claim to be Muslims have made themselves the noted killers of the world using bombs on innocent men, women and children. Bombs are the thing they are most noted for. Hey bombs are their thing.

Soft on defense, hard on babies?

Vote Dummycrat!

Iraq, Vietnam it's not

Why Iraq is not Vietnam:

Coward Dean, leading anti-American American spokesman for the Al-Queda and the head of leading fifth column, the Dummycrats, declared surrender, “We can’t win in Iraq, it’s just like Vietnam.” (Note: The party formerly known as the Democrat Party has admirably chosen to realize the hypocrisy of being against the propagation of democracy in the world so they have chosen to change the party’s name.) Well, the situation may look to defeatists like Vietnam all over again, and while the Dummycrats are staking their future on America’s defeat and their mindless fascination with making it Vietnam, it’s not.
In Iraq we are fighting, along with the ever strengthening Iraq forces, an enemy composed of a portion of the minority Suni population, the Saddamist and Islamic fascists led by al Zaquari. This combined coalition cannot hold a city or town and is not safe anywhere in Iraq. The leader of these foreigners in Iraq is a leader in Al-Queda. This is the group that took down the World Trade Center on 9/11. The leaders of the communists in Vietnam never attacked New York City.
In Vietnam, two great communist powers in the world supported and backed the North Vietnamese. In Iraq, support comes, less openly, from Iran and Syria. These are two evil regimes for sure, but not the same as Russia and China. Not the same as the Vietnam War.
In Iraq, a democracy is building, step by step in a very rapid way, providing an alternative to the fascists plan for Iraq that Al-Queda foresees. That incidentally, is a vision greater than just holding Iraq, but rather making it the capital for increased military power to first unify all Muslim countries under a single control then taking over the entire world. This is a little broader the Vietnamese communists plan was which was to control their own country. Not a good outcome but not a threat to the whole world either.
Often the critics say our efforts in Afghanistan were ok but Iraq was a mistake. Fighting there has made the Islamic fascists angry. That’s like saying American forces approaching the Rhine River made the Germans angry and led to the Battle of the Bulge. Iraq is just the current battlefield with these crazies who want to take the world back the twelfth century and battle the Crusaders again. The struggle is not about Iraq any more than World War II was about Guadalcanal.
Forgotten, is the struggle in the Philippines to bring democracy to that former Spanish colony. A rebel insurgency was put down and today the country is, for better or worse, a democracy. This struggle in Iraq is more similar to that than Vietnam.
Unlike Vietnam, the struggle to bring democracy to Iraq is one we cannot afford to lose. Establishing a Islamo fascist regime in Iraq would create a base for the killers which would out do the one in Afghanistan allowed by the Taliban. Even though they won, the Vietcong never planned an attack on Western civilization as do the Islamo Fascists.
Finally the key difference is that now, even though there is still the same cabal of treachery in the US Senate calling for cut and run, the US will never do that as long as President George Hebert Walker Bush is President.

New name for the fifth column

Historic news: The fifth column group headed by the diminutive bug out boy from Vermont has decided on a name change. Having placed their trust and backing in the roadside bombers and assassins of Al-Qaeda in Iraq, the group is changing its name. How very appropriate. The formerly kook led party once known as the Democrat Party will now be the Dummycrats. Smart move. Along with Moveon.org and the rest of the anti-American Americans, the party will now officially back isolation as well as not winning since America is the evil thing in the world. Fostering democracy is out. This will be their choice for a foreign policy. Isolation has worked so well, say before WWII or say after we bugged out in Mogadisu. Congrats to the Dummycrats.

The fifth column of anti-American Americans continue in their traitorous efforts to defeat the US efforts to bring democracy to Iraq. Led by the diminutive Howie Dean, the Dummycrats, continue to froth at the mouth, mouthing the big lie that the President lied about the reasons for freeing Iraq from a dictator who is in the league of Hitler and Stalin. They rejoice at the total of deaths of American soldiers while never considering the numbers of enemy killers that have been taken out. They downgrade the brave Iraqis that are taking more and more responsibility for their own country. In short the Dummycrats are investing in an American defeat with their unrelenting implacable hatred of ‘W’. Shame, shame on these despicable dimwits that live in an alternate universe of myth and lies.

Why this mindless search for whoever outed Valerie Plame? {Her husband is known to have done this months before Scooter Liby ever heard of her.} First of all she’s not a covert agent. She works at the CIA clipping newspapers. Give me a break! Second of all, the fact that she is a CIA agent should help support the lies her husband told. Yes, things he says about his CIA mission have been proved lies. He is the one that should be investigated. But the really stupid thing in all this is there is a CIA leak. The left wing rags printed the information about ‘secret’ prisons the CIA has for the great quantity of terrorists it has taken off the streets in foreign countries. Now the Jihadists will know where to attack to set these top line killers loose again to kill more unbelievers. We are like Alice in Wonderland.

The Lie of the Century

Now we have the lie of the century. According to the left wing extremist that now control the Democrat Party, George Bush “lied” to us about why we took out the most heinous dictator around, the man who has the undisputed record of killing the most Muslims in history, SaddamHussein. There were no weapons of mass destruction.

And one bright morning, after he had illegally stolen the election, he decided that we should take out Saddam. He alone, was telling us this whopper about these nonexistent weapons.
This, of course, is the lie. This is the lie of the century.

The truth is a little different. Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, and he used them. Ask the Kurds, visit the semi ghost town where he gassed them. Recall a little history, even if it does not support the anti-American American’s cherished lie of the century. The Israelis took out Saddam’s nuclear reactor to thwart his weapons program. But, it didn’t stop it. British Intelligence sticks by their assessment that he was attempting to get “yellow cake” a key ingredient for a nuke from Africa. Every intelligence agency in the world agreed on that Iraq had a nuke weapons program.

After the war, we found no weapons, but the labs where work was progressing were found. He either hid them or sent them out of the country at some point before the GI’s arrived. What the hell ever, he doesn’t have them now and he won’t be the one using them on us.

Those far leftist who sit now in the Senate, frothing at the mouth over this week’s “auspicious” event of having lost two thousand soldiers in Iraq as Senator ‘hicup’ Kennedy joyously said. (I thought waving the Al Qaeda flags and sporting the little yellow “Free Saddam” pins was a bit much.)

But, truth of the matter is that the Senate, the two faced liar, Senator Kerry, I wanned be President after trashing America over Vietnam, voted to send in troops, twice, with the same intelligence W had.

To try to rewrite history, that is the lie.

We need a fence, a fence on the southern border to the United States. We are being invaded, our country and culture undermined. Those that complain that this would be unfriendly to Mexico need to look to the southern border of that country. They have troops on their borders and run what smacks of concentration camps. This government’s opinion of us, a government which aids and abets this invasion is of little concern. The President of Mexico actually began his campaign for reelection in California, which one supposes he realizes it is now one of the Mexican states.
Those defeatists insist that the distance is too great for a fence forget the truth. There is a fence in Israel, which has worked in reducing terrorism across its border. It does not go the full distance. Neither would a fence on our border, it should be placed in those areas that the Border Patrol knows are the freeways of the criminals coming across. The effect would be to funnel the traffic, leading to better apprehension in the unfenced areas.
There is a fenced portion of the border around San Diego. It works.
The President who is in office, and has allowed terrorists to come over what is now a laughably porous non barrier will literally have hell to pay.

The latest poll in Britain shows that six per cent of their Muslim population supports the terrorist bombings of 7/7. Some twenty four per cent have sympathy and almost half understand the motives of the bombers. About a third would like to end western civilization. In short about 100,000 have no sympathy for the country they are living in.

Here is some unsolicited advice to England. Be proactive and take some steps to reduce this disloyal population.

· Halt immigration from any country where the Wahabi “religion” of hate is practiced.
· Monitor all mosques and make it illegal to preach this brand of hate, Wahabism.
· Any mosque found doing this should have all its property forfeited to the government and the clerics deported.
· Require all Muslim citizens to assimilate into the general population. This could require the end to wearing religious costumes, certainly learning English and taking an oath to support laws and culture of the country.

All this is very un-libertarian, but whether everyone agrees or not, western civilization will continue to be attacked until each country deals with these crazies.

While the Mother Country goes its way, we need to do these things here as well.

We are being invaded! Go to REFORMUS.ORG to sign their petition!

A Friendly Proposal to the Democrat Party Faithful

We need a vibrant and healthy Democratic Party. There is a great danger that those who now control the party will put yet another spin on the truth. Their message was not misunderstood and falsely restated by the Republicans. What there was of it beyond WE HATE BUSH was bested in the arena of ideas, politics. All things change in time except truth. It’s time for the leaders of the party to steer to the center again. You do not have to become Republicans, just keep it perfectly clear you are not with the crazies

A case in point, is the vulgar fat delusional propagandist Michael Moore. He became the defacto face of the party. Decent, reasonable Democrats should loudly distance themselves from him. If the New York Times et al were worth ten to fifteen s in the election, Moore was worth twenty to thirty to the Bushies.

There was a better time when politics stopped at the shoreline of America. Democrats need to listen to those among them that do not believe America is evil, and that all answers come from the UN and that appeasement is the answer to being attacked. Plus, a record of not bashing the military would be helpful. JFK and FDR took America’s side against a misguided world.

There are issues which the Democrats can work on. Bring big Parma to heel. Drug prices are a disgrace. They are what the market will bear here, which is ok, except the power of the Federal Government should be used to level the playing field. As long as we are into disallowing free speech as with the wildly successful Campaign Finance law, advertising drugs on TV should be eliminated. Drugs should be tested, not against nothing, but against the current best drug for the problem.

The party should be the party of change for the better. One thing that must change is Social Security. Digging heels into the sand and saying nothing must change is being a deer in the headlights.

Democrats should champion keeping a woman free to choose abortion or pregnancy prevention but be reasonable about partial birth abortion.

Democrat of today, could as did the party in the past, stand for States Rights, particularly in regard for what might be called moral issues. If Massachusetts wants gay marriage, or Oregon wants the right to die, or Nevada OK’s prostitution, then so be it. Let the people in the state, not a judge trying to make law, decide it.

Above all, Democrats need to come up with practical, if not generally currently accepted solutions to problems. Desist from demonizing the opposition. Yes, Republicans too.

Things that should be done

In no particular order, here are some things which are not always popular but should be done.

• Pass an Amendment to the Constitution, that gives the President a line item veto of any spending measure. Who in the world could be against this? The really big government people I guess.
• Start a two pronged attack on our dependence on foreign oil. Allow drilling on the moonscape in northern Alaska, and begin a wartime shift from oil to hydrogen. See phoenixproject.net
• Pass a Guest Worker program which does not reward illegal aliens.
• Get an exit strategy. Not for Iraq or Afghanistan, we have plans there but for Germany, Japan, Korea, the Balkans and any other place we have no national interest in being there.
• Follow through with a plan to get men to Mars.
• Use the buying power of Medicare Care to get competitive bids on prescription prices.
* Use Shot Spot for professional tennis matches

Thoughts on Immigration Policy Changes

Recently President Bush’s concept to set up a Guest Worker Program has come under intense fire from his own supporters. The concept in greeted as just another amnesty for illegal immigrants although the plan does not automatically grant citizenship to guest workers. The cry is that criminal trespassers are being given a reward which will just lead to an increased avalanche of Mexicans paddling across the border. But we do need the workers and we do need to control the flow of non-citizens in and out of this country. How about this? Have the plan only for new people from Mexico or other countries, signing up as the plan envisions, being vetted with cooperation of the Mexican government to disallow criminals and the like. The current many millions of illegals would have to return to Mexico before being allowed to enter the program. They would be given a period to return to Mexico. If they are caught after this deadline they would be forever disallowed from being in the Guest Worker Program. To make any of this work a there needs to be a Federal Law that all law enforcement officers in the United States must turn over any and all illegals to the Homeland Security Department and to have deportation swift and sure.

Elementary Logic: The Sidewalk is NOT causing the rain.


Some misguided souls among us look at the spots of water on the sidewalk and decide the sidewalk is causing the rain. So it is today with some who see the fanatic Muslims spread their murder and killings of innocents around the world. In their denial, they feel it was President Bush’s fault for visiting London that caused there to be terror attacks against British interests in Turkey. No, the terrorists stuck there because they could. It is a measure of the success in the War on Terror that these suicide killers are reduced to hitting soft targets, preferably where there isn’t that much security. But, the terrorists are the one’s doing the killing not the President of the United States. Note that Turkey defied the US, disallowing the US Army access to Iraq from their shores. The Turks probably were doing this with the hope that this would spare them of the terrorist’s attacks. Cowering before these monsters doesn’t help; at least it didn’t stop the bombings in Istanbul.

As Printed in the AZ Republic



Isolationist policy won't stop terror
Oct. 31, 2003 12:00 AM


Regarding Robert Robb's column Wednesday, "Why is U.S. such a target?":

I at least like his tone: not dripping with hate the way most Bush-haters are these days.

But Robb is wrong. These fanatics hate everyone. Besides the Sept. 11, 2001, atrocity, they have killed citizens in Bali, workers from the United Nations and the Red Cross in Baghdad and even fellow Saudis in Saudi Arabia. These miscreants hate anything that does not follow their anti-freedom credo of taking the world back the 10th century.

Jimmy Carter pulled the rug on the shah and we got the ayatollah. Saddam Hussein killed more Muslims than anyone in history.

We are at least opposing Arafat under Bush, not kissing him in the Rose Garden as Clinton did.

Be plain about what you want. What Robb wants is an isolationist, cut-and-run policy. Maybe he can gain support for his position, but then we will be fighting in Cleveland, not Baghdad.